Page 2 of 4

Re: Build Thread Contents page

Posted: Thu Aug 18, 2011 6:08 pm
by Mikewazowski
:lol:

Would you believe it felt natural to click on the blue part that says it's a link, not the actual red link itself? :P

Maybe I'm just weird.

Re: Build Thread Contents page

Posted: Thu Aug 18, 2011 6:32 pm
by braasmonkey
Mikewazowski wrote::lol:

Would you believe it felt natural to click on the blue part that says it's a link, not the actual red link itself? :P

Maybe I'm just weird.
Weird indeed...lol. My signature now recognises the Mikewazowski's of the world :lol:

Re: Build Thread Contents page

Posted: Thu Aug 18, 2011 7:28 pm
by Bartman
I'd prefer the links to be red.

If anyone wants to make a start, lepper and/or I can jump in and make some progress as we go.

Re: Build Thread Contents page

Posted: Thu Aug 18, 2011 7:35 pm
by Dattochriswagon
Im fully digging your style there brassy. Hilarious.
Yeh im also loving the idea of a contents page.
Bang check everything out from 411 to S30

Re: Build Thread Contents page

Posted: Thu Aug 18, 2011 7:42 pm
by gingofthesouth
Links should be blue as that is the industry standard and the least likely to cause confusion. I didn't realise Brassy's red text was a link either.

Either you do what you want Bart since you are the one putting the work in on the page Lolz

Re: Build Thread Contents page

Posted: Thu Aug 18, 2011 8:08 pm
by braasmonkey
Dattochriswagon wrote:Im fully digging your style there brassy. Hilarious.
Yeh im also loving the idea of a contents page.
Bang check everything out from 411 to S30
Thanks Chris, I aim to please (most) :P
gingofthesouth wrote:Links should be blue as that is the industry standard and the least likely to cause confusion. I didn't realise Brassy's red text was a link either.

Either you do what you want Bart since you are the one putting the work in on the page Lolz
Sorry for not conforming to 'the industry standard' ging...will try harder next time :lol:
Bartman wrote:I'd prefer the links to be red.

If anyone wants to make a start, lepper and/or I can jump in and make some progress as we go.
Is there a naming convention you are going to stick to? Would be nice to keep things looking spick and span and easy to understand. Basics obviously would be:

Full Year - Make (Nissan/Datsun) - Model Name - Model Code - Exact Nickname

E.g. 1972 - Datsun - 1200 - B110 - braasmonkey

or

1972 Datsun 1200 (B110) - braasmonkey

This will hopefully help newish guys like myself know what I'm looking for/at at first glance (a couple of build threads don't say) :) Was just being silly with the colours, but just a suggestion regarding naming/title convention :D Happy to help if required Bart.

Regards,

- Braasy

Re: Build Thread Contents page

Posted: Thu Aug 18, 2011 8:25 pm
by Dattochriswagon
Yeh !

Re: Build Thread Contents page

Posted: Thu Aug 18, 2011 9:34 pm
by dirtyleppa
ill do it as a year and model way, example, 1975 1200 coupe. im not going to go crazy with the chassis codes as i dont know fuck all. ill group all the nissans under one, and the other random bits under other

Re: Build Thread Contents page

Posted: Thu Aug 18, 2011 10:15 pm
by Bartman
I thought the post might look like this [sample]

Datsun 1200 (KB110)
Speed freaks 1200 coupe
Kitch's 1200 coupe

etc
etc
Datsun 120Y (B210)
Datsin's 120Y sedan
Alex gallager's 120Y wagon
Chrustywhip's 120y wagons

etc
etc
Datsun 1600 (510)
Bartmans 510
SRDATO's 510
Datsunboy's KP510
etc
etc


And we can rejig it so that it's coupes, wagons, etc. It'l be heaps of work, but well worth it.
Plus it'll make a sweet reference tool for piners who want to fill their wank bank with a particular model of datsun porn.

I think it'll take a few days to catalog the whole project forum.

Re: Build Thread Contents page

Posted: Thu Aug 18, 2011 10:23 pm
by datsunboy
looks good bart....I too believe the links should be blue