1985 GB122 1200 Sunny Ute
Re: 1985 GB122 1200 Sunny Ute
definitely looks the goods at that height!
- mint16
- Financial Member
- Posts: 1854
- Joined: Sat Jul 19, 2008 8:36 am
- aka: Brendan
- Location: Christchurch
Re: 1985 GB122 1200 Sunny Ute
Whats with the can?
Thats not the correct way to check vehicle ride height.
Thats not the correct way to check vehicle ride height.
72 Datsun 1200 Wagon
86 Toyota AE85 Trueno 4AGE ITB
86 Toyota AE85 Trueno 4AGE ITB
- Tony_Whenua
- Financial Member
- Posts: 433
- Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2012 6:58 pm
- Location: Blenheim
- Contact:
Re: 1985 GB122 1200 Sunny Ute
I don't follow...just thought that all structural parts minus the sump have to be above 100mm or do the bottom part of the leaf springs not count?mint16 wrote:Whats with the can?
Thats not the correct way to check vehicle ride height.
How do you measure the ride height?
"Dude you're like 30 degrees retarded" - Chris_g1 & 2 Doors
Re: 1985 GB122 1200 Sunny Ute
Cellphone or with money between the wheel and arch.
Re: 1985 GB122 1200 Sunny Ute
Im no expert, but I would think that the leafsprings would be included in that 100mm, from the pics it looks like your lowering blocks are the issue there, but if you use smaller ones you will effectively raise the ute, to save me going through your thread, are you trying to do this without cert? if so you will need to raise the rear, in this instance.Tony_Whenua wrote:I don't follow...just thought that all structural parts minus the sump have to be above 100mm or do the bottom part of the leaf springs not count?mint16 wrote:Whats with the can?
Thats not the correct way to check vehicle ride height.
How do you measure the ride height?
- Tony_Whenua
- Financial Member
- Posts: 433
- Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2012 6:58 pm
- Location: Blenheim
- Contact:
Re: 1985 GB122 1200 Sunny Ute
Yeah I haven't touched the ass end. Its the set up from when I had 17s keeping me off the ground. Been looking up other ideas also but unsure about what will get me through a WOF without Cert.2 doors wrote:Im no expert, but I would think that the leafsprings would be included in that 100mm, from the pics it looks like your lowering blocks are the issue there, but if you use smaller ones you will effectively raise the ute, to save me going through your thread, are you trying to do this without cert? if so you will need to raise the rear, in this instance.
Will look and flipping the rear leafs and then see what I have to remove off the blocks
Other option is put my sedan struts in and take the blocks out then get it a WOF as taking an inch out of the rear will prob make it look like I've tried to hot rod it.
"Dude you're like 30 degrees retarded" - Chris_g1 & 2 Doors
- mint16
- Financial Member
- Posts: 1854
- Joined: Sat Jul 19, 2008 8:36 am
- aka: Brendan
- Location: Christchurch
Re: 1985 GB122 1200 Sunny Ute
Ah my bad, I see what youve done there.
Reverse eye the rear leaves to counter act the height issue?
I think Ive gone anti-rules since leaving the AA as a wof inspector...
Reverse eye the rear leaves to counter act the height issue?
I think Ive gone anti-rules since leaving the AA as a wof inspector...
72 Datsun 1200 Wagon
86 Toyota AE85 Trueno 4AGE ITB
86 Toyota AE85 Trueno 4AGE ITB
- EMs SR1200 UTE
- Regular
- Posts: 84
- Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2012 4:53 pm
- Location: fakatane
- Contact:
Re: 1985 GB122 1200 Sunny Ute
Had allways thought it was the chassis rail that had to be 100mm off the ground.......dont quote me tho.
S13 SR20 Datsun Roadster Ute
Re: 1985 GB122 1200 Sunny Ute
No^.
It is 100mm to the lowest structural point. However it seems what is seemed structural is up to the individual.
Tony, I had no trouble when I had those wheels and 2" lowering blocks, even got a VTNZ wof.
It is 100mm to the lowest structural point. However it seems what is seemed structural is up to the individual.
Tony, I had no trouble when I had those wheels and 2" lowering blocks, even got a VTNZ wof.
- Tony_Whenua
- Financial Member
- Posts: 433
- Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2012 6:58 pm
- Location: Blenheim
- Contact:
Re: 1985 GB122 1200 Sunny Ute
LOOKS LIKE IM OFF FOR A WOF ON SATURDAY!!! .... but were you at the same height?beaver wrote:No^.
It is 100mm to the lowest structural point. However it seems what is seemed structural is up to the individual.
Tony, I had no trouble when I had those wheels and 2" lowering blocks, even got a VTNZ wof.
"Dude you're like 30 degrees retarded" - Chris_g1 & 2 Doors