Re: a12 performance suggestions
Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2014 9:04 pm
A15's can be made to rev hard, but I agree that A14's seem to rev easier.
The thing which the A14's have over the A15's is the rod to stroke ratio. Since the A14's and A 15's utilise the same conrod, but the A15 has a longer stroke. The A14 has a shorter "dwell" at tdc/bdc. Longer rods make more torque. (Although longer strokes make the best torque as a rule of thumb)
Since the dwell is shorter, the "intake event" has a longer duration (in degrees of crank rotation) meaning more charge finds its way into the cylinder.
Obviously the A series aren't torque monsters in N/A configuration. So they rely on their ability to rev hard to complete the package.
I have a soft spot for the A14 too. I revved an old one of mine to over 9k. (Thanks to a dicky rev counter)
The thing which the A14's have over the A15's is the rod to stroke ratio. Since the A14's and A 15's utilise the same conrod, but the A15 has a longer stroke. The A14 has a shorter "dwell" at tdc/bdc. Longer rods make more torque. (Although longer strokes make the best torque as a rule of thumb)
Since the dwell is shorter, the "intake event" has a longer duration (in degrees of crank rotation) meaning more charge finds its way into the cylinder.
Obviously the A series aren't torque monsters in N/A configuration. So they rely on their ability to rev hard to complete the package.
I have a soft spot for the A14 too. I revved an old one of mine to over 9k. (Thanks to a dicky rev counter)