Re: James 85 ZX - So Close to mad camber & slammage
Posted: Sun May 27, 2012 7:06 pm
Wicked dude!
New Zealand Datsun Club
http://www.nzdatsun.com/
https://datsun.co.nz/forum/
James Z31 Engine Blueprinting
Page 42 of 80
Re: James 85 ZX - So Close to mad camber & slammage
Posted: Sun May 27, 2012 7:32 pm
Sorry dude i havent read too much into your mad camber but a mate of mine went for cert in his GX71 Toyota and got thrown out on camber and ride height so best talk to your certifier as they are cracking down on this now
Re: James 85 ZX - So Close to mad camber & slammage
Posted: Sun May 27, 2012 7:42 pm
from what i have read on oldschool, having pretty any amount of camber is a no no. apparently your car is not allowed to have any more camber that what it had factory.
Re: James 85 ZX - So Close to mad camber & slammage
Posted: Sun May 27, 2012 7:44 pm
Ah Rats
Plan was to send it in for cert at Track day Auto X ride height so I don't have to get wheel alignments every 5 minutes.
I suppose as long as i Stick to something like 120mm ground clearance and maybe 2deg front and rear that should get me through.
When your mate failed how low & cambered was he ?
Plan was to send it in for cert at Track day Auto X ride height so I don't have to get wheel alignments every 5 minutes.
I suppose as long as i Stick to something like 120mm ground clearance and maybe 2deg front and rear that should get me through.
When your mate failed how low & cambered was he ?
Re: James 85 ZX - So Close to mad camber & slammage
Posted: Sun May 27, 2012 8:10 pm
The new rule is no more than half a degree more neg than the maximum range was in the factory specs.
Re: James 85 ZX - So Close to mad camber & slammage
Posted: Sun May 27, 2012 8:38 pm
WTF.....When did this come into play... and for what reason?
They are just fucking with things for no reason
They are just fucking with things for no reason
Re: James 85 ZX - So Close to mad camber & slammage
Posted: Sun May 27, 2012 8:46 pm
OE Front 0.5833 Max under new rules = 1.0
OE Rear -1.9167 Max Under new rules = 2.4
Front is kinda weak, I think i can make do on the rear though.
Cheers for the heads up guys, saved me falling flat on my face on inspection day
OE Rear -1.9167 Max Under new rules = 2.4
Front is kinda weak, I think i can make do on the rear though.
Cheers for the heads up guys, saved me falling flat on my face on inspection day
Re: James 85 ZX - So Close to mad camber & slammage
Posted: Sun May 27, 2012 8:54 pm
Quite recently. Is cos of all the fags with rwd nissans running 123456789 degrees camber, and crashing.torqued wrote:WTF.....When did this come into play... and for what reason?
They are just fucking with things for no reason
Cletus (The tame LVVT certifyer at OS) said it was bought out at the most recent training day.
Kids also mentioned that his g/f's Dad (Wayne Martin) also told his this.
It's only an issue for cert. Get cert, then crank that shit up hard. Kinda like getting a wof, then refitting the uber low springs.
Re: James 85 300zx
Posted: Sun May 27, 2012 9:07 pm
During my apprenticeship the first thing we were told was disregard factory spec and look at the was the car was wearing tyres. as it more related to the drivers driving style
Re: James 85 300zx
Posted: Sun May 27, 2012 9:09 pm
Just reading up about it now.
Heres a link to all info http://www.lvvta.org.nz/documents/infos ... _Guide.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
So in theory when I lower my 180 and have heaps of neg camber will I need to make an adjustable rear end for cert?
Heres a link to all info http://www.lvvta.org.nz/documents/infos ... _Guide.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
So in theory when I lower my 180 and have heaps of neg camber will I need to make an adjustable rear end for cert?