![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
Would you believe it felt natural to click on the blue part that says it's a link, not the actual red link itself?
![Razz :P](./images/smilies/icon_razz.gif)
Maybe I'm just weird.
Weird indeed...lol. My signature now recognises the Mikewazowski's of the worldMikewazowski wrote:![]()
Would you believe it felt natural to click on the blue part that says it's a link, not the actual red link itself?![]()
Maybe I'm just weird.
Thanks Chris, I aim to please (most)Dattochriswagon wrote:Im fully digging your style there brassy. Hilarious.
Yeh im also loving the idea of a contents page.
Bang check everything out from 411 to S30
Sorry for not conforming to 'the industry standard' ging...will try harder next timegingofthesouth wrote:Links should be blue as that is the industry standard and the least likely to cause confusion. I didn't realise Brassy's red text was a link either.
Either you do what you want Bart since you are the one putting the work in on the page Lolz
Is there a naming convention you are going to stick to? Would be nice to keep things looking spick and span and easy to understand. Basics obviously would be:Bartman wrote:I'd prefer the links to be red.
If anyone wants to make a start, lepper and/or I can jump in and make some progress as we go.